Engineering Experts — Planning AI Project

Global

🏢 About Vetto

Vetto is a global platform that connects top-tier professionals to strategic Artificial Intelligence projects around the world. Our mission is to build trust, quality, and long-term value within the AI ecosystem, for both exceptional talent and companies operating at the forefront of technology.

📖 About the project

We're recruiting engineering experts to review and improve real-world technical scenarios used to train AI planning assistants in an educational context. The AI model will act as a tutor — explaining engineering topics, solving problems step by step, and teaching concepts to university-level students. Your job is to think like a senior engineer and educator: map decision trees, identify alternative hypotheses, justify conclusions with concrete data, and ensure the reasoning is both technically sound and clear enough to teach.

👤 Who can apply

  • Mechanical, Civil, Electrical, Chemical, Industrial, or Aerospace Engineers
  • Any engineer with hands-on experience diagnosing problems, designing solutions, or running technical analyses
  • Professionals who routinely make data-driven decisions in their field
  • Final-year undergraduate engineering students with solid technical foundation are also welcome to apply

Instructions

In this application, you will answer questions following the instructions below. If selected, you will be invited to review real engineering case scenarios as part of the project.

For the reasoning case, present a real technical engineering problem you diagnosed or solved — a failure, root cause analysis, dimensioning decision, process issue, etc. You may anonymize it. We are not evaluating whether your conclusion was right. We are evaluating how you think.

The case is structured in 4 parts:

Part 1 — The Problem: describe the technical problem and what data or information you had available at the start.

Part 2 — Your Journey: describe your reasoning in 3 steps. For each step, explain what you analyzed or decided and what specific measurement, calculation, test, or evidence drove that decision.
Part 3 — Discarded Alternatives: for each of the 3 steps, list at least 2 hypotheses you considered but ruled out and explain what concrete data eliminated each one. "It wasn't the case" is not a valid answer.

Part 4 — Conclusion: describe the final diagnosis or solution and how the evidence you gathered led to it.

Compensation

Payment will be US$ 60 per approved task, converted and paid in your local currency. Each task takes approximately 80 minutes, which corresponds to an effective rate of about US$ 45 per hour. 

Refer People -> Earn Money

If you'd like to refer someone, you can earn $20 USD for each approved referral. To participate: click "Refer & Earn" to share your personal referral link.

‼️ AI is not allowed. If we spot AI use, we'll block the application.
⚠️ This application form must be completed entirely in English or Portuguese.

Apply for this job

*

indicates a required field

Phone
Resume/CV

Accepted file types: pdf, doc, docx, txt, rtf


Resume/CV*

Accepted file types: pdf, doc, docx, txt, rtf

Select...
Select...
Select...
Select...

Less than 2 years / 2–5 years / 5–10 years / More than 10 years

What was the context? What data, measurements, or information did you have available at the start?

For each step, explain what you analyzed or decided and what specific measurement, calculation, test, or evidence drove that decision. 

Explain what concrete data or finding eliminated each one. "It wasn't the case" is not a valid answer.

How did the evidence you gathered across the steps lead to this conclusion?
These could be a piece of data that confirmed your direction, a detail that ruled out a strong alternative, or a non-obvious observation that most people would have missed.